
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() James Varick |
HISTORY OF THE AFRICAN METHODIST EPISCOPAL ZION CHURCH |
|||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
![]() |
||||
|
[The Negro] was
wanted in the church for the support he gave it, for
the numbers he enabled sectarians to claim in exhibiting their
strength, and with the minority, who were truly pious, he was wanted
there for the good of his soul. For these and other reasons he was not
kept entirely out of the church. But in the church he was hampered and
regulated. His privileges were proscribed and limited; every possible
effort was made to impress him with a sense of inferiority. Preachers
were selected who delighted in discoursing to him upon such texts as "Servants
obey your masters," and who were adept at impressing the
Negro with inferiority in the most ingenious and least offensive way...
1
|
||||
![]() |
||||
| However, | ||||
![]() |
||||
|
The fathers [of the AME
Zion Church] agreed that they had no fault to
find with doctrines, form of government, and evangelistic and
soul-saving emphases of Methodism, but they could not endure the
constant humiliation and restriction imposed by the people into whose
hands Methodism had fallen. The founders were opposed to slavery and
inhumane treatment of slaves, so that they could logically remain
Methodists because of the spirit of the originators and the meaning of
the first-born movement in England and America. 2
|
||||
![]() |
||||
| By 1820, the AMEZ Church was ready to break its organizational ties to the Methodist Episcopal Church, which still refused to ordain African-American elders. Bishop William Walls continues with the story: | ||||
![]() |
||||
|
We come now to the
most dangerous period of the effort to form the
African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church.... There were those who wanted
to be a Negro unit in the Methodist Church. There were others who
wanted nothing less than separation and independence from the Mother
Methodist Church. There were still others who felt a sympathy with the
black groups in other areas, such as the AME Bethel Church and the
African Union Church of Wilmington, De., and preferred to see a unity
of them all.... Those who had definitely decided on withdrawing from
the white church and forming a denomination of freedom and
self-assertion began a part of their action by appointing a committee
of five to form a Discipline for the new church group. In a church
meeting held at the Rose Street Academy on September 18, 1820, they
appointed James Varick, chairman, George Collins, secretary, Charles
Anderson, Christopher Rush, and William Miller the committee to draw up
the Discipline of the independent church movement. It was to conform
with the Methodist Church Discipline, as relating to doctrines, polity,
and spiritual government. 3
|
||||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
|
FOOTNOTES: 2 Walls, William J., The African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church: Reality of the Black Church, (Charlotte, N.C.: AME Zion Publishing House, 1974), p. 45. 3 Ibid., 71.
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||